Requests for Evidence rarely come from a single dramatic mistake. They come from small gaps — a date that doesn't match across two forms, a missing signature page, an exhibit that was never labeled. Individually minor, collectively expensive.
Where errors actually come from
Most immigration teams catch these gaps manually, late, during a final review when a deadline is already close. By then, fixing an inconsistency means re-opening a document that was supposed to be finished days ago.
Clerify's document intelligence reads every uploaded file the moment it lands in a case — extracting names, dates, A-numbers, and cross-referencing them against the rest of the file. Inconsistencies surface as flags, not surprises during a review meeting.
Built for how paralegals actually work
The system doesn't try to replace judgment — it removes the tedious cross-checking that eats hours per case. A paralegal still decides what to do with a flagged discrepancy; Clerify just makes sure nothing slips through unnoticed.
The best filings are the ones nobody has to think twice about. That's the bar we build to.
What this means for your firm
Firms using automated document review report meaningfully fewer RFEs tied to clerical mismatches — freeing attorneys to spend review time on substance, not spreadsheets.
